In the weeks following the passing of Chinese actor Yu Menglong, renewed online discussions have brought past rumors and behind-the-scenes allegations about his career back into the public spotlight. Among the most debated claims circulating on social media is the suggestion that Yu was once internally labeled a “loss-making artist” by his former agency, EE-Media — a claim that remains unverified and unsupported by any official documentation.
According to online commentary and archived forum posts shared by netizens, Yu Menglong was allegedly marginalized after refusing certain social engagements often described within the industry as “unwritten rules.” Some users speculate that his reported refusal to attend inappropriate dinners or networking events may have led to reduced resources, fewer opportunities, and prolonged periods of low visibility during his career.
These claims have ignited strong reactions online. Many netizens questioned the logic behind the alleged treatment, with comments such as, “If he was considered a loss, why not release him?” and “The real loss belongs to the system that restricted him.” Others expressed frustration over what they see as a broader imbalance of power between artists and management companies.
Fans have also revisited Yu Menglong’s work history, noting extended gaps between projects and limited promotional support compared to peers with similar popularity. Some commentators believe these patterns point to systemic issues within the entertainment industry, where artists may face long-term psychological pressure when denied creative freedom or career autonomy.
Names such as Tian Hairong have appeared anonymously in online discussions related to alleged “unwritten rules,” though no public evidence, official accusations, or legal findings have been presented. Importantly, Yu Menglong himself never made public allegations against any individual or organization during his lifetime.
As of now, EE-Media has not issued any official response to the renewed discussions. Industry observers note that silence from involved parties has further fueled speculation, though it does not constitute confirmation of any claims.
At present, all such narratives remain allegations rooted in online discourse rather than established fact. Media analysts urge the public to approach these discussions critically, distinguishing between verified information and speculation, while acknowledging the broader conversation they have sparked about transparency, artist protection, and mental health within the entertainment industry.
Disclaimer: This article summarizes public discussions and online reactions. All claims referenced remain unverified and should not be interpreted as confirmed facts.
