In recent days, a disturbing rumor has begun circulating across social media platforms and online forums, drawing widespread attention and controversy. The claims, which authorities have firmly denied, allege that the individual responsible for the death of actor Yu Menglong has experienced a series of supernatural events described by netizens as a “blood curse.”
According to unverified posts, the suspect reportedly discovered strange symbols resembling a blood ritual near his bedside. Online storytellers claim that in the middle of the night, the man appeared to enter a trance-like state, rose from his bed without awareness, and walked directly toward a window as if compelled by an unseen force. The rumor further alleges that moments before jumping, he suddenly regained consciousness, collapsed to his knees, and begged aloud for mercy.
These accounts have spread rapidly, fueled by screenshots, anonymous comments, and sensationalized retellings. Some users have framed the story as karmic retribution or spiritual punishment, while others have linked it to traditional folklore involving vengeful spirits and curses. No photographic or video evidence has been provided to support these claims.
Law enforcement agencies have responded by categorically rejecting the rumors. In a brief statement, officials emphasized that the case remains grounded in legal and medical investigation, and that there is no evidence of supernatural involvement. “Online claims involving curses, possession, or paranormal events are entirely unsubstantiated,” the statement read. “The public is urged not to spread misinformation that could interfere with due process.”
Legal experts have also warned that such narratives may distort public perception and cause unnecessary fear. Psychologists note that extreme stress, guilt, or sleep disorders can sometimes lead to vivid hallucinations or disoriented behavior, which may later be exaggerated through online storytelling.
Despite official denials, the rumor continues to evolve, with some netizens treating it as an urban legend, while others insist it reflects a deeper moral message. Platforms have begun moderating the most graphic or misleading versions of the story, labeling them as unverified content.
As the investigation proceeds, authorities reiterate that only confirmed information released through official channels should be trusted. The public is encouraged to approach sensational online stories with skepticism and restraint, particularly when they involve real individuals and ongoing legal cases.
